Abstract
The top 1%, executives of energy production companies in the US, control media outlets and politics. They serve their own benefit, narrow the general public's perception on climate change, and raise the risks of starvation spreading. They accuse scientific consensus of being exaggerated and overly pessimistic, and work to control climate policy. This destroys the democratic process. For example, Rupert Murdoch, CEO of News Corporation who owns major shares in Genie Oil, is adopting a new strategy in which he controls farming lands around the world, gradually. He does this because when fossil fuels run out, he wants to have a say in saving the world from soon-coming food-shortages. Survey we conducted shows great hopes in the publics’ background on the issue and willing to take intuitive. The shortsightedness opportunist selfish politics will backlash, and in the future everyone will know what is best to do.
Income disparity contributes to an uneven
distribution of power, and leads to the obstruction of economic growth and
environmental sustainability. The current state of division of wealth in the
world gives the top 1%, especially executives of energy production companies in
the United States, control over media outlets and politics. Side effects of which include narrowing the general public's
perception on climate change, and raising the risks of starvation spreading
globally. This provides corporate-heads with the advantage of benefitting from
buying farming lands in third-world countries and having an upper hand in
fighting food shortages when fossil fuels run out. By identifying the
individuals in power and holding them responsible for their crimes and
examining the contradictions in the opinions they spread, we can understand the
general and specific consequences of their actions. Looking at real life
examples can help us design a renovated economical system, which when we
follow, we will be able to restore and improve urban infrastructure.
In the
United States, poor press coverage on climate disruption is blamed on the lack of specialist
journalists in the field. But, analysis claims “portrayals of climate
science on Fox News Channel and in the Wall Street
Journal’s opinion section,” of New Corporation, “are
overwhelmingly misleading”
(Union of Concerned Scientists 7). When Rupert
Murdoch, CEO of News Corp, was asked to express his views on environmental
concerns, he dismissed the alarming reports made by scientists on the devastating
impact that climate change is causing the planet. "We should approach
climate change with great skepticism," he said. "Climate change has
been going on as long as the planet is here. There will always be a little bit
of it” (The Australian 19:55). Murdoch wants the
public to think of his networks’
approach towards climate change as
environmental skepticism, but in fact, it is self-censorship. Murdoch owns
stakes in energy companies of great import —i.e. Genie Oil and Gas, and Shale Gas and Oil.
This disqualifies him of talking from a neutral perspective. Because of his
alliance to capitalist enterprise, he favors the interests of international
corporations over those of the individual citizen. He uses environmental
skepticism as a tactic in his favor. By accusing scientific consensus of being
exaggerated and overly pessimistic, he controls climate policy formation for
his own benefit.
In July
2014, Australia became the first nation to repeal pro-environment carbon laws that put a price
on greenhouse gas emissions (ROB, and RHIANNON 2). This is not the first time
Tony Abbott, Australian Prime Minister, had pushed to serve fossil energy
companies. Abbott and his advisors deny climate science in the hopes of landing
highly ranked positions in the energy production business. Fore example, in a
classic revolving door maneuver, Matthew Warren, chief executive of the Clean
Energy Council, switched jobs to the Energy Supply Association of Australia,
and ironically earned a position where he would have a greater influence on
deciding how to deal with climate change than he ever did in the CEC (GILES
23). Another key facet to the carbon tax repeal is the role of Murdoch-owned
media in Australia. More than 59% of daily newspaper sales go to Murdoch. His
papers provide the main new source on environmental issues for the Australian
public. This gives Murdoch-owned companies global impact, as they do not only
have power to control public opinion but also political decision making.
Currently, the Abbott government is choosing to block international climate
change negotiations in the United Nations. Time and time again, Abbott has
stated that he “will not allocate anymore money,” to the cause of reducing Australia's carbon
emissions, throwing the UN’s new post-2020 climate agreement in Paris
into disorder (LENORE 35).
This does not only destroy democratic systems
and renders the voting process useless, but also raises the risks of starvation
spreading globally.
According to the company’s
annual reports, Murdoch’s New Corp. invested $30 million Australian
dollars in cattle farms, but did not disclose the deal to its investors (EDWARD
8). Covering up the transaction can be attributed to the insignificance of $30
million Australian dollars, about $28.5 million US, in the bookkeeping of News.
Yet, more investigation must go in to this matter. Although this secretive deal
has come undone, we must consider the possibility of other deals under the
table. In the small and medium enterprise world, environmental decline is raising
many concerns, either as a reason of the beliefs and values of a company’s
management, or the pressure exerted by the market— consumers and
institutions (CAMBRA-FIERRO, JESU ́S, SUSAN HART, and YOLANDA POLO-REDONDO 645).
Environmental respect and sustainability are considered to be relevant
management factors in not SME context alone. In the big corporate world,
environmental respect is called ethics of self-interest. For the sake of
profit- maximization, companies, like News Corporation, are opt to develop and
manage a positive corporate reputation. In hopes to appear more environmental
friendly, Murdoch is adopting a new strategy in which he controls farming lands
around the world, gradually, so when fossil fuels run out, he has a say in
saving the world from soon-coming food-shortages.
As
further proof, we attempted to measure the public’s perspective on climate
change issues through a survey, and this is what we found:
When
asked to classify climate change as a problem, 27% of the participants answered
that it was a problem for the future. This shows the strength of the grip
corporate-owned media outlets has on the public’s perception. In a very
close 25% of the participants found that climate change was a problem for now.
This can help turn the scales if handled properly.
When asked about
their top sources for news on environment policy, 67% of the participants chose
Internet news sites, and 60% chose television. These two results can be very
eye opening. They help us comprehend the power of the new media, and encourages
us to focus on it as a medium for total free expression, and reminds us the
television is still living and thriving, which we are ought to watch out from.
Still wanting to understand the public’s
perception of climate change, we asked the participants about what they thought
of the relationship between the consumer and the media, and whether it was
direct or indirect and served a secretive agenda. Much to our surprise, the
exact same number of participants answered in favor of a secretive agenda
existing, as those who were undecided.
Lastly, we asked the participants to rate
their willingness to change their lifestyles order to save the Earth, and found
that the greatest majority rated from moderately willing to extremely willing.
This result is very promising, because it encourages action to be taken from
hesitant governments.
There are
many obstacles standing between us and the betterment of the environment. To
start facing those obstacles, we need to fight misinformation about climate science; we must rethink the media we
consume. We need to encourage questioning the static queue by teaching students
to use the right terms when discussing environmental issues. As industrial
countries, how can we reduce our resource consumption when our economic system
is derived from the needs of the industrial revolution? We must think beyond
materialistic possessions. The appeal of capitalism rests in it creating the
wealthiest society Earth has ever seen. This society is very exclusive, and
most of us, Earth residents, are broke. The shortsightedness opportunist
selfish politics will backlash, and in the future everyone will know what is
best to do